Child Soldier Debate!!

Today's debate format is set up in a way that will help you write your argument essay over the weekend. Rounds 2 and 3 are specifically designed to lay the groundwork for the counterargument section of your essay. Remember, there are two objectives in a counterclaim. #1 poke holes in your opponent's theory. #2 play defense for your own theory. 

Avoid words that don't further your argument. For example, people who believe child soldiers are criminals should avoid using the words victim or brainwashing whenever possible. 

Take words or phrases that your opponent used in their initial argument, and turn them around to use their own words against them. Redefine the circumstances to better align with your theory. For example, someone who believes that child soldiers are perpetrators could question the use of the word "victim," and remind their opponent of all the innocent "victims" the child soldiers killed in incredibly brutal ways. 

As you write your argument essay supporting whichever side you support on this issue... be sure to use the notes you have from the debate activity. What are the most relevant pieces of evidence to support your thesis.

     Choose a thesis:

1. Child soldiers should be prosecuted for their crimes, because they are perpetrators.
2. Child "soldiers" should not be prosecuted for their "crimes," because they are victims of horrific circumstances.